Training Needs Analysis.

The problem this solves

Most AI training is bought on a hunch. Someone senses the team is behind, picks a course, and hopes it lands.

The trouble is that a mixed group rarely shares one gap. Some people are already confident. Others have not started. Generic training bores the first group and loses the second.

You end up paying for a day that fits almost nobody in the room.

What you get

A clear map of where each group actually is, set against the capabilities their roles need.

A short report that names the real gaps, ranks them, and says what to do about each one. It is written in plain language, so you can act on it without a translator.

If you choose to follow through, the same findings shape the training that comes next. Nothing gets measured twice.

How it works

We start with a conversation about the roles and the outcomes you care about.

From there I assess the relevant groups, through a mix of light survey, task-based checks and short interviews, sized to how disruptive you want it to be.

You get the report and a recommendation. Commission the training that follows, run it in-house, or simply keep the map for later. The choice stays yours.

Proof

The diagnosis sits at the heart of a wider compliance framework, and the analytics work shows how capability gets measured and tracked.

Scope & pricing

Scoped to the size of the workforce and the depth you need. Costs are quoted up front, from a day rate, with no open-ended meter running.